Wednesday, November 30, 2016

These numbers should SHUT UP liberals about the Electoral College once and for all

These numbers should SHUT UP liberals about the Electoral College once and for all

By Michele Hickford, Editor-in-Chief5:10pm  November 29, 2016

The keening and caterwauling we’ve been treated to by the left since Hillary Clinton’s defeat has been monumental.

Most entertaining has been the snowflake retreat to “safe spaces” with puppies and coloring books to assuage their anguish.

Less entertaining were the violent protests which were paid for erupted in cities across the nation.

Advertisement - story continues below

Putting aside Jill Stein’s quixotic effort to force a recount, the left has been loudest with its demands to dismantle the Electoral College.

After all it’s unfair: Hillary Clinton won the “popular vote” so she should win, right?

Wrong.

Our Founders in their infinite wisdom created the Electoral College to ensure the STATES were fairly represented. Why should one or two densely populated areas speak for the whole of the nation?

The following list of statistics has been making the rounds on the Internet and it should finally put an end to the argument as to why the Electoral College makes sense.

Share this with as many whiners as you can.

There are 3,141 counties in the United States.

Trump won 3,084 of them.
Clinton won 57.

There are 62 counties in New York State.

Trump won 46 of them.
Clinton won 16.

Clinton won the popular vote by approx. 1.5 million votes.

In the 5 counties that encompass NYC, (Bronx, Brooklyn, Manhattan, Richmond & Queens) Clinton received well over 2 million more votes than Trump. (Clinton only won 4 of these counties; Trump won Richmond)

Therefore these 5 counties alone, more than accounted for Clinton winning the popular vote of the entire country.

These 5 counties comprise 319 square miles.
The United States is comprised of 3, 797,000 square miles.

When you have a country that encompasses almost 4 million square miles of territory, it would be ludicrous to even suggest that the vote of those who inhabit a mere 319 square miles should dictate the outcome of a national election.

Large, densely populated Democrat cities (NYC, Chicago, LA, etc) don’t and shouldn’t speak for the rest of our country.

Amen.



Sent from my iPhone

Thursday, November 24, 2016

Trump adviser tells House Republicans: You're no longer Reagan's party

Trump adviser tells House Republicans: You're no longer Reagan's party

By Jonathan Swan 6029 Shares

Donald Trump’s economic adviser Stephen Moore told a group of top Republicans last week that they now belong to a fundamentally different political party.

Moore surprised some of the Republican lawmakers assembled at their closed-door whip meeting last Tuesday when he told them they should no longer think of themselves as belonging to the conservative party of Ronald Reagan.

They now belong to Trump’s populist working-class party, he said.

A source briefed on the House GOP whip meeting — which Moore attended as a guest of Majority Whip Steve Scalise — said several lawmakers told him they were taken aback by the economist’s comments.

“For God’s sake, it’s Stephen Moore!” the source said, explaining some of the lawmakers’ reactions to Moore’s statement. “He’s the guy who started Club for Growth. He’s Mr. Supply Side economics.”

“I think it’s going to take them a little time to process what does this all mean,” the source added of the lawmakers. “The vast majority of them were on the wrong side. They didn’t think this was going to happen.”

Asked about his comments to the GOP lawmakers, Moore told The Hill he was giving them a dose of reality. 

“Just as Reagan converted the GOP into a conservative party, Trump has converted the GOP into a populist working-class party,” Moore said in an interview Wednesday. “In some ways this will be good for conservatives and in other ways possibly frustrating.”

Moore has spent much of his career advocating for huge tax and spending cuts and free trade. He’s been as close to a purist ideological conservative as they come, but he says the experience of traveling around Rust Belt states to support Trump has altered his politics. 

“It turned me more into a populist,” he said, expressing frustration with the way some in the Beltway media dismissed the economic concerns of voters in states like Ohio, Pennsylvania and Michigan.

“Having spent the last three or four months on the campaign trail, it opens your eyes to the everyday anxieties and financial stress people are facing,” Moore added. “I’m pro-immigration and pro-trade, but we better make sure as we pursue these policies we’re not creating economic undertow in these areas.”

After such a transformative experience — and after witnessing Trump’s stunning victory — Moore now believes Republican House members should be less ideologically pure and instead help Trump give the voters what he promised them. 

“He wants to spend all this money on infrastructure,” Moore said, referring to Trump’s potentially trillion-dollar infrastructure package.  

It’s a massive spending bill that naturally appeals far more to Democrats than Republicans. Moore, who has worked for the ultra-conservative Heritage Foundation, is not a fan of the stimulus package, but he is prepared to support it.

“I don’t want to spend all that money on infrastructure,” Moore said. “I think it’s mostly a waste of money. But if the voters want it, they should get it.”

“If Trump says build a wall then he should build a wall. If Trump says renegotiate TPP [the Trans-Pacific Partnership trade deal], he should renegotiate TPP.”

“Elections have consequences,” Moore added, “and I do think Donald Trump has a mandate.”

Moore says his “view on trade has adjusted a bit” over the course of the 2016 campaign.

“I used to be unilateral free trader,” he said. “If somebody wants to sell something to us at less cost than we can produce here, then do it."

“But the political reality,” he added, “is there’s a backlash against trade. Whether we like it or not we better adapt the rules in ways that benefit American workers more, or free trade is not going to flourish. 

“We can scream and whine all we want but that’s reality.”

Moore is excited about large parts of Trump’s agenda. He helped write Trump’s tax plan and thinks the cuts will accelerate economic growth and create new jobs. He’s also had a hand in Trump’s energy plan and looks forward to slashing regulations hindering American energy production.

But Moore knows the days of Reaganite conservatism are probably over.

“Reagan ran as an ideological conservative. Trump ran as an economic populist,” he said. 

“Trump’s victory,” Moore added, “turned it into the Trump party.”



Sent from my iPhone

Obama DOJ Fines Sheriff’s Office $10,000 for not Hiring Non-Citizens as Deputies

Obama DOJ Fines Sheriff’s Office $10,000 for not Hiring Non-Citizens as Deputies

DENVER, CO - May 13: Swearing in ceremony during the Denver Sheriff's department Academy graduation at the Renaissance Hotel May 13, 2016. This year's graduating class represents the largest group of recruits in the department's history with 80 graduates. (Photo by Andy Cross/The Denver Post)

Once again, we see how the criminal Obama administration works in reaching into an area it has no constitutional authority to reach into, namely the local sheriff’s office. The Denver County Sheriff’s Office has been fined $10,000 by the Department of Justice for not hiring non-citizens as deputies.

The Daily Caller reports:

Denver County’s sheriff office has been slapped with a fine by the Department of Justice (DOJ) because it refused to hire non-citizens as deputies.

From the beginning of 2015 through last March, the Denver Sheriff Department went on a major hiring binge, adding more than 200 new deputies. But those jobs ended up only going to citizens, because the department made citizenship a stated requirement on the job application. The department admitted as much in a new settlement with the U.S. government, which requires it to pay a $10,000 fine.

The department will also have to comb through all of its job applications from the past two years, identifying immigrants who were excluded from the hiring process and giving them due consideration.

“Eliminating this unlawful citizenship requirement will help ensure that the Denver Sheriff Department hires the best and most qualified individuals to protect and serve,” DOJ Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General Vanita Gupta said in a statement. “The entire community will benefit from these reforms.”

The Immigration and Nationality Act demands that employers are required to give equal treatment if they have valid work permits, unless local, state or federal law explicitly requires the jobs to employ only citizens.

Now, call me crazy here, but why would you want a foreigner, who is not a citizen, to be employed in your local Sheriff’s Office? Furthermore, what constitutional basis is there for the central government to make such demands on any employer? Is this not a clear violation of the First Amendment with respect to determining with whom one will associate?

As for the Sheriff’s Office, they claim they did not know it was a violation of federal law. To be honest, it should be challenged as I see nothing in the Constitution that gives authority for Congress to make such a law against employers.

In fact, more than 40 states have laws in opposition to federal law that will only allow citizens to hold jobs as police.

In an October 2015 report released by the DOJ, citizenship requirements were ripped due to wanting to create a “diverse” police force.

“While Federal law allows law enforcement agencies to impose a citizenship requirement where it is authorized by state or local law, this requirement may prevent a considerable number of racial and ethnic minorities – many of whom have valuable foreign language skills – from being hired by law enforcement agencies,” the report read.

In an emailed statement, sheriff’s spokesman Simon Crittle said, “The Denver Sheriff Department maintains its commitment to treat all people with dignity and respect, and is proud to have one of the most diverse workplaces in Colorado.

“While we didn’t commit this violation intentionally, we accept responsibility and are taking steps to clarify policy and amend language in hiring documents.”

To be honest, it should be challenged as I see nothing in the Constitution that gives authority for Congress to make such a law against employers.

The Sheriff’s Office has been hiring 200 deputies.

Again, doesn’t it just make common sense to have citizens in this line of work?



Sent from my iPhone

GOP elite 'moderating' Trump's stance on 'climate change'

GOP elite 'moderating' Trump's stance on 'climate change'

Republican base troubled by Donald's comments to N.Y. Times

WND EXCLUSIVE

President-elect Donald Trump and House Speaker Paul Ryan (Photo: Twitter)

President-elect Donald Trump and House Speaker Paul Ryan (Photo: Twitter)

NEW YORK – In a move deeply troubling to the base of voters who helped propel him to the White House, Donald Trump told the New York Times he had “an open mind” on whether or not to support the United Nations climate accord, prompting the left-leaning Mother Jones to feature the headline “Trump Now Believes That Manmade Climate Change Is Real.”

Defenders of Trump, such as Marc Morano at ClimateDepot.com, were quick to point out that in the meeting with Times reporters on Tuesday, Trump restated his skepticism of global warming, charging the media had “falsely spun” his comments.

“The media have created a cartoon-version view of Trump’s climate views,” Morano told WND. “If he says anything short of global warming is a hoax created by Chinese, (which he said was a joke tweet) then they say he flip-flopped.”

Yet, in his attempt to defend Trump, Morano also expressed disappointment.

Get the hottest, most important news stories on the Internet – delivered FREE to your inbox as soon as they break! Take just 30 seconds and sign up for WND’s Email News Alerts!

“The reality is Trump has been very clever about presenting his climate views. What he told the New York Times was very nuanced and scientifically correct,” Morano said.

“While I wish he would have said the U.N. Paris agreement was finished, I think he was trying to be nuanced with the onslaught of climate activists at the New York Times,” Morano concluded.

WND was unable to reach for comment Sen. James Inhofe, a frequent critic of climate-change activists who seek a United Nations tax on the U.S. consumption of carbon-based fuels that effectively would redistribute wealth to developing nations.

WND received no response from a detailed email asking Trump spokesman Jason Miller and Sean Spicer of the Republican National Committee to respond to questions regarding Trump’s comments to the Times.

Sign the precedent-setting petition supporting Trump’s call for an independent prosecutor to investigate Hillary Clinton!

Instead, WND received a phone call from a Trump campaign insider who had played an important role in the campaign and insisted on not being named.

The insider expressed concern that Washington-based Republican Party operatives – including Reince Priebus, Trump’s newly appointed White House chief of staff, and Spicer, among others – were attempting to moderate Trump’s message to make it more compatible with the views of House Speaker Paul Ryan and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell.

At issue in the phone call was an article Politico published Tuesday, “15 Trump flip-flops in 15 days,” alleging instances in which Trump has moderated policy positions he held during the campaign.

“If Trump had said on the campaign stump what he told the New York Times on Tuesday regarding the U.N. climate accord, Hillary Clinton would be president-elect, not Trump,” the insider said.

The insider noted that like the Trans-Pacific Partnership, the U.N. climate accord is a global governance agreement poorly negotiated by the Obama administration, placing an onerous international cost on U.S. taxpayers that will drive up the cost of energy while dampening economic growth.

Times presses Trump to save Obama’s legacy deal

On Nov. 10, two days after Trump won the U.S. presidential election, the New York Times published an article noting that during the campaign, Trump had called human-caused climate change a “hoax” while vowing to dismantle the Environmental Protection Agency.

“Mr. Trump cannot legally block other countries from fulfilling their Paris agreement commitments, nor can he quickly or unilaterally erase Mr. Obama’s climate rules,” New York Times reporter Coral Davenport wrote.

Davenport said Trump’s campaign position against the U.N. climate accord was putting at risk a central component of outgoing-President Obama’s “proudest legacy.”

“But if Mr. Trump makes good on his campaign promises, experts in climate change policy warn, that legacy would unravel quickly.” Davenport continued. “The world, then, may have no way to avoid the most devastating consequences of global warming, including rising sea levels, extreme droughts and food shortages, and more powerful floods and storms.”

As reflected in the transcript of Trump’s Tuesday meeting with the New York Times, Trump gave the newspaper reason to relax.

When questioned by James Bennet, the editorial page editor, whether there was any causal connection between human activity and climate change, Trump equivocated.

“I think right now … well, I think there is some connectivity,” he said. “There is some, something.”

Get the hottest, most important news stories on the Internet – delivered FREE to your inbox as soon as they break! Take just 30 seconds and sign up for WND’s Email News Alerts!



Sent from my iPhone

Wednesday, November 23, 2016

Why the 2016 Election Proves America Needs the Electoral College

Why the 2016 Election Proves America Needs the Electoral College

image from https://s3.amazonaws.com/feather-client-files-aviary-prod-us-east-1/2016-11-20/fc0984d7-8bfb-4f9e-bf05-4e7b0851abdb.png

Let’s hear it for the electoral college! The main reason for giving smaller states proportionally greater representation than bigger states in the Electoral College is the same reason for giving each state two senators regardless of its size: to help ensure that the federal government would look out for the interests of all the people, not just the ones in the bigger states, as Jarrett Stepman explains: “The Electoral College system was designed to ensure that presidents would have to receive support from a diverse array of people around the country. Modern candidates have to accommodate farmers in rural states, factory workers in industrial states, and software engineers in tech-dominated states. The president must consider the needs and opinions of people across the country instead of just the views of a few, highly populated urban centers.”



Sent from my iPhone

Tuesday, November 22, 2016

The Electoral College Is Anything But Outdated

The Electoral College Is Anything But Outdated

In a deeply divided nation, a candidate shouldn’t be able to win by appealing only to urban sophisticates.

The outrage from Hillary Clinton supporters came immediately: Donald Trump might have won the Electoral College, but he appears to have lost the popular vote. This was said to be a violation of democracy, one that defied the principle of “one man, one vote.” A Yale professor slandered the Founders by telling the website Vox that the Electoral College was created to protect slavery.

We can think about this better if we understand two...



Sent from my iPhone

Sunday, November 20, 2016

How Van Jones Became a Star of the 2016 Campaign

How Van Jones Became a Star of the 2016 Campaign

WASHINGTON — Last Thursday, Van Jones couldn’t even buy a tuna wrap here without a woman in her late 20s walking up to him to ask for a selfie. Two minutes later, the Argentine woman behind the counter gave him a thumbs up.

“It’s like this everywhere,” said Mr. Jones, 48. “I haven’t paid for a cab since the election.”

That is when this CNN commentator, whose fiery political exchanges with supporters of President-elect Donald J. Trump over the last nine months have often gone viral, declared that the Republican nominee’s victory represented a “whitelash” against a black president and a changing electorate, as well as a deeply painful moment for minorities in America.

“You tell your kids, ‘Don’t be a bigot,’” he said on camera. “You tell your kids, ‘Do your homework and be prepared.’ And then you have this outcome, and you have people putting children to bed tonight. And they’re afraid of breakfast. They’re afraid of, how do I explain this to my children?”

Perhaps predictably, these comments garnered swift outrage from some on the right, such as Rush Limbaugh, who said the election had “nothing to do with white people wanting their country back on racial concerns.” But in the liberal enclaves Mr. Jones inhabits, they were treated as something like gospel: a moment of naked honesty in a campaign season filled with distortions.

“I’ve heard people say it was a star-making moment,” said Mr. Jones’s friend Ava DuVernay, the Oscar-nominated filmmaker. She quickly added that she had held him in that regard for quite some time, given his three-decade career in civil rights activism, his best-selling books on progressive issues and the considerable time he has spent on the lecture circuit.

Growing up in Jackson, Tenn., Mr. Jones knew from an early age he would wind up doing a version of what he is doing now. His parents were educators who taught him about the importance of hard work and social justice.

“In their view, excellence was a weapon against bigotry,” said Mr. Jones, who worked on a student newspaper at the University of Tennessee at Martin before going to Yale Law School.

Upon getting his law degree, Mr. Jones said, he moved to the Bay Area, was dumped after “like two weeks” by the woman he had relocated for and began working in criminal justice reform, starting the Ella Baker Center for Human Rights, an organization he named after the pioneering activist who mentored Stokely Carmichael and Representative John Lewis of Georgia.

There, said Bryan Stevenson, who as the founder and executive director of the Equal Justice Initiative is one of the nation’s most prominent voices on issues of mass incarceration and race, Mr. Jones emerged as an “early architect” of the movement, who got “people all over the country to care about” criminal justice reform.

Right after Mr. Jones won a Reebok Human Rights Award in 1998, he spoke at the University of California, Berkeley, and met a law school student named Jana Carter, who ultimately became his wife. (They have two sons, 12 and 8, and live in Los Angeles. Mr. Jones asked that his children’s names not be published.)

But suing the police and staging protests took their toll. So did defending those who were released from prison but had no real opportunities for rehabilitation or employment. By 2002, Mr. Jones was seriously burned out.

“I went to counseling, meditation groups, did every kind of self-improvement course you could imagine,” Mr. Jones said. “Tony Robbins, Landmark Forum, Hoffman Institute. I was like Frankenstein, experimenting on myself.”

With former Vice President Al Gore’s green movement picking up steam, Mr. Jones soon had an epiphany: Why not try to bring together the fights against pollution and poverty, training nonviolent offenders to work in eco-friendly construction, doing things like installing solar panels. He saw it as an ideal form of manual labor, since it couldn’t be outsourced to other countries.

This became the subject of a best-selling book called “The Green Collar Economy” and led to a post in the Obama administration as an adviser to the president.

The honeymoon was short-lived.

Just six months after Mr. Jones arrived in Washington, the conservative talk-show host Glenn Beck started an investigation into his past and found evidence showing Mr. Jones had flirted with communism in college and had made impolitic comments about Republicans in a videotaped address.

Mr. Beck also charged that Mr. Jones had signed a 2004 petition from 911truth.org, a group that believes the United States government was involved with the attacks on the World Trade Center.

As the Drudge Report began linking to the stories and right-wing radio had a field day, it became clear that he had become a liability to the White House and he resigned.

Another dark period followed (”an emotional black hole,” as Mr. Jones described it), but he was able to rebuild his reputation.

In July 2010, 911truth.org removed his name from a list of those who support its mission, after reviewing its records and failing to find evidence that Mr. Jones had signed the original petition. Then came a visiting professorship at Princeton University and a friendship with Prince, with whom he played table tennis, discussed black history (and was admonished by to stop swearing). And in 2012, CNN hired Mr. Jones to appear on a new iteration of “Crossfire” with Newt Gingrich, Stephanie Cutter and S. E. Cupp.

“The show did not last, but we loved Van’s voice,” said Jeff Zucker, the network’s president, who kept him on afterward as a commentator.

In March 2015, Mr. Jones went on the air to talk about the 50th anniversary of the march on Selma, Ala., and received a message on Twitter from Ms. DuVernay, the director of the Academy Award-winning film “Selma,” about the civil rights struggle that led to the passage of the Voting Rights Act of 1964.

They struck up a correspondence and went to breakfast in downtown Los Angeles, where Ms. DuVernay explained that she was working on a documentary about the criminal justice system for Netflix and wanted him to be a part of it.

He said yes and referred Ms. DuVernay to Mr. Gingrich, who despite being on the opposite side of the aisle, is now his good friend, and talks in the film about the disparity in sentencing guidelines for white users of powder cocaine and black users of crack cocaine.

Today, the movie, “13th,” is a front-runner for the Academy Award for Best Documentary, and Mr. Jones has set up a production company to identify multimedia projects.

Central to his progressive mission is finding common ground with right wingers, even as he disagrees with them on matters big and small.

“He makes the conversation better every time he’s a part of it,” said Anderson Cooper, the CNN anchor. “He’s not an ideologue who’s regurgitating talking points. He’s incredibly thoughtful.”

“There’s a ritual Rock ’em Sock ’em Robots quality to TV news, where everyone is supposed to come bludgeon the other person with their talking points,” Mr. Jones said. “And over the course of the last 18 months, I’ve fallen out of love with that. I think the truth is messy.”

That segues neatly to Mr. Jones’s new web series for CNN, called — what else? — “The Messy Truth.”

It debuted in late October, and the first episodes featured Mr. Jones going to Gettysburg, Pa., where he spoke with empathy and open-mindedness to Trump supporters, who discuss their economic concerns and heartbreak over being branded as racists simply because they support Mr. Trump.

Several thanked Mr. Jones at the end for really listening to them and asked him to pose for pictures. The symbolism of this black man surrounded by a phalanx of star-struck white Trump supporters was hard to miss. (A televised special of “The Messy Truth” will air on CNN Dec. 6)

Consequently, Mr. Jones didn’t want people to infer from his election-night comments that he thinks all of President-elect Trump’s supporters are bigots. At the same time, he thought it was essential not to brush aside the role of racism in Mr. Trump’s ascent.

“If you only focus on the toxic crap, you’re not being fair to the Trump voters,” Mr. Jones said. “But if you deny all the toxic crap, you’re not being fair to the rest of Americans.”

There is little denying that Mr. Jones is popular among his colleagues at CNN, particularly after watching him last Thursday evening on a rooftop set overlooking the Capitol for a special taping of “Anderson Cooper 360.”

A cameraman approached during one of the breaks and implored him to run for office. “Please!” Mr. Jones said, “I’m running from office.”

Then, Khizr Khan, the Muslim Gold Star father who spoke out against Mr. Trump at the Democratic National Convention, approached to praise Mr. Jones.

“We need more voices like his,” Mr. Khan said.

Mr. Jones had gotten into a testy interchange the night before with his Evangelical co-panelist Kayleigh McEnany as she all but accused him of race-baiting and he admonished her to stop interrupting him. Yet as they sat side by side near Mr. Cooper, shooting the breeze during commercials, it was clear no harm had been done.

“I think she’s amazing,” Mr. Jones said.

If there was anything disappointing about the evening, it was that Mr. Jones’s other on-camera nemesis — Jeffrey Lord, a staunch Trump defender and former aide to Ronald Reagan and Jack Kemp — wasn’t there for one of their ferocious but friendly altercations.

“How can you not like Jeffrey?” Mr. Jones said. “He’s adorable. He’s like a Fraggle.”

Then he paused. “If a Fraggle had a tendency towards terrible revisionist history.”

“Which is exactly how I feel about him,” said Mr. Lord, speaking later by phone. “I think Van’s a terrific person and a great friend. We just disagree on everything, and God bless America.”



Sent from my iPhone

Steven Van Zandt Wants the Cast of ‘Hamilton’ to Apologize to Mike Pence

Steven Van Zandt Wants the Cast of ‘Hamilton’ to Apologize to Mike Pence

Theo Wargo (2) / Mike Wilson, Getty Images
Theo Wargo (2) / Mike Wilson, Getty Images

Social media today was filled with the news that Vice President-elect Mike Pence had attended a production of Hamilton, the smash Broadway musical about Founding Father Alexander Hamilton, with the cast delivering a post-show message to Pence about his policies on the rights of gays and minorities. Although he’s no fan of Pence, Steven Van Zandt of the E Street Band felt that the action crossed a line and spent the day on Twitter arguing his case with fans.

Hamilton made a mistake,” he tweeted. “Audiences shouldn’t have to worry about being blindsided like that. Theater should be sanctuary for Art to speak.”

After calling Hamilton “the greatest play since West Side Story” and its creator, Lin-Manuel Miranda, a “genius,” van Zandt said Miranda should apologize to Pence, adding, “He was their guest. You protect your guests. Don’t embarrass them. When artists perform the venue becomes your home. The audience are your guests. It is nothing short of the same bullying tactic we rightly have criticized Trump for in the past. It’s taking unfair advantage of someone who thought they were a protected guest in your home. … Nobody on this planet disagrees more with everything Pence represents. But I don’t tolerate bullying in any form. Even the respectful kind.”

Hamilton made a mistake. Audiences shouldn't have to worry about being blindsided like that. Theater should be sanctuary for Art to speak.

— Stevie Van Zandt (@StevieVanZandt) November 19, 2016

Lin-Manuel is a genius. He has created the greatest play since West Side Story. He is also a role model. This sets a terrible precedent>

— Stevie Van Zandt (@StevieVanZandt) November 19, 2016

>Completely inappropriate. Theater should be a safe haven for Art to speak. Not the actors. He needs to apologize to Mike Pence @Lin_Manuel

— Stevie Van Zandt (@StevieVanZandt) November 19, 2016

There has never been a more outspoken politically active artist than me. He was their guest. You protect your guests. Don't embarrass them.

— Stevie Van Zandt (@StevieVanZandt) November 19, 2016

When artists perform the venue becomes your home. The audience are your guests. It is nothing short of the same bullying tactic we rightly>

— Stevie Van Zandt (@StevieVanZandt) November 19, 2016

>have criticized Trump for in the past. It's taking unfair advantage of someone who thought they were a protected guest in your home.

— Stevie Van Zandt (@StevieVanZandt) November 19, 2016

Nobody on this planet disagrees more with everything Pence represents. But I don't tolerate bullying in any form. Even the respectful kind.

— Stevie Van Zandt (@StevieVanZandt) November 19, 2016

Of course nobody is giving him a pass for any of his views! That is not the time or place to do it. Picture it happening to someone you like https://t.co/6a8ORvuUk0

— Stevie Van Zandt (@StevieVanZandt) November 19, 2016

You don't single out an audience member and embarrass him from the stage. A terrible precedent to set. https://t.co/vREKw2RTMR

— Stevie Van Zandt (@StevieVanZandt) November 19, 2016

The statement is beautiful. And completely inappropriate at that time. And I would defend the cast's right to be inappropriate forever. https://t.co/VpP0rd9C5v

— Stevie Van Zandt (@StevieVanZandt) November 19, 2016

Following the show, Brandon Victor Dixon, who stars as Aaron Burr, thanked Pence for attending the musical, which has a largely black and Latino cast and whose titular character is played by Javier Munoz, who is gay. Then Dixon said, “We, sir, are the diverse America who are alarmed and anxious that your new administration will not protect us, our planet, our children, our parents, or defend us and uphold our inalienable rights, sir. But we hope this show has inspired you to uphold our American values, and work on behalf of ALL of us.” The statement was co-written by the cast, Miranda and director Tommy Kail.

However, one of Van Zandt’s bandmates, Nils Lofgren, didn’t have a problem with the musical’s action. “The audience had the freedom to boo,” he tweeted. “The statement was truth to power. Any chance you get to speak truth to power right now, you have to take it.”

It is ok to disagree. The audience had the freedom to boo. The statement was truth to power. https://t.co/cV7kV1uQuS

— Nils Lofgren (@nilslofgren) November 19, 2016

Any chance you get to speak truth to power right now, you have to take it. https://t.co/KDNf9UWABM

— Nils Lofgren (@nilslofgren) November 19, 2016

Bruce Springsteen Albums Ranked Worst to Best

Next: 10 Things You Didn't Know About Steven Van Zandt



Sent from my iPhone

How Racism Played An Important Role In This Election

How Racism Played An Important Role In This Election

“When you’re white… you don’t know what it’s like to be poor.”

I was driving home from work when I heard a clip of Bernie Sanders saying this in a debate against Hillary. It struck as incredibly important. In a quick flash of truth, the left had revealed itself.

The left’s most recent narrative of identity politics has entirely conflated poverty with institutional racism. “Black and Hispanic people in America are poor because of undeniably institutionalized oppression.” Questioning this truth is a product of your white privilege. 

Where then, does this leave white poverty? 

In a blatant refusal to answer this simple question, the left has chosen to ignore white poverty altogether. It simply does not exist. The liberal narrative tells us that black poverty in the United States is caused by the aftereffects of slavery, Jim Crow, and biased incarceration. It also tells us that when you’re white, you are showered in privilege. When you’re white, you don’t know what it’s like to be poor.

Lisa Pruitt, a law professor at the University of California, stated the following in an article from October of last year

There is such a disconnect between the people in power in this country and the rural poor. It’s a negative feedback loop. If you’re deciding who you are going to admit to Harvard and you see they grew up socio-economically disadvantaged from rural America, the knee-jerk reaction is, ‘We don’t want those people among us. They’re racist. They’re uncouth. They’re unsavory.

In other words, the same institutions of higher learning that profess to value diversity and inclusion as their highest tenets don’t want to admit you if you’re from a white, rural, poor community, because the very thought of you does not mesh with their delicate sensibilities. 

A few targeted google searches for clear statistics on white poverty did not yield useful results. I was disappointed, but not surprised, by the fact that it wasn’t necessarily easy to come by. White poverty isn’t at the top of academia’s current research list, as it does little to further the current liberal narrative. I did, however, find a Miami Herald article that shared an interesting glimpse into the poor white America that liberal ideology has forgotten:

As it turns out, our deeply racialized view of poverty bears no resemblance to reality. Though it’s true that African Americans are disproportionately likely to live below the poverty line, it is also true that the vast majority of those in poverty are white: 29.8 million people. In fact, there are more white poor than all other poor combined.

Owsley County (Booneville is the county seat) is the epicenter of that poverty. Median income here is less than $20,000. The obesity rate is 50 percent. Life expectancy: 71.4 years, more than seven years below the national average. With 36 percent of its citizens living below the poverty line and 98.5 percent of its population identifying as white, it is the poorest — and one of the whitest — places in America

Liberals have chosen to cast aside the white poor, nearly 30 million of them, as acknowledging their experience, or very existence, throws a wrench in the “white privilege” agenda. This dismissal has robbed these individuals not only of their place within social discourse, but of the resources and solutions their communities need. 

There is an interesting irony to the fact that the white, rural poor felt that a billionaire from New York City was their one chance to gain a voice within our national discourse; a voice that had been all but snuffed out by an administration and Media Complex who for the past 8 years has told white Americans that they are nothing but privilegedimplicitly racist, and abhorrently toxic.

I am in no way discounting that poverty among minority communities is a significant problem. There is absolutely no denying that many Hispanic and African American communities are in need of real solutions to combat the poverty and violence that cripple their ability to thrive. What I am saying is that by constantly attributing these problems to institutional racism, and by refusing to acknowledge a reality that is so diametrically opposed to their existing agenda, the left has abandoned 30 million white Americans living in poverty. 

Racism, therefore, may have played a significant roll in the outcome of this election. Just not in the way they want us to believe it did. 

For the sake of full disclosure, I’ll mention that I am not poor: my family is decidedly middle class and while we often pinched pennies and cut coupons, I never went without. Nor am I entirely white: my mother is Mexican, my first language is Spanish, and I did not step foot in this country until 2002. The experience of white rural poverty is not my own, but it is an American experience that I refuse to ignore.



Sent from my iPhone