Monday, February 9, 2015

Georgia House votes unanimously for solar financing bill

Georgia House votes unanimously for solar financing bill

Georgia’s House quickly passed solar energy legislation on a unanimous vote Monday, sending it to the Senate for consideration.

Called the Solar Power Free Market Financing Act, House Bill 57 is aimed at making it easier and more affordable for Georgia homeowners and small businesses to put solar panels on their rooftops.

The bill — sponsored by Republican state Rep. Mike Dudgeon of Johns Creek — clarifies how homeowners can get outside financing of small solar installations. Solar advocates say a key to winning over homeowners is to make it easier to finance installation and equipment, which can cost $15,000 or more. With financing, homeowners can avoid upfront costs and pay for their use of the system over time.

“House Bill 57 is really about one primary thing and that is to make financing of solar panels legal for residences and small business,” Dudgeon told the House moments before the vote.

For years, solar legislation has failed to win House passage. But the latest bill eases earlier concerns that Georgia Power and other utilities have expressed about the safety of new installations, as well as their worries that the state would let in rival retail utilities.

The legislation, according to supporters, has been in the works for months and more than 90 parties have been involved with it. Georgia Power and trade associations that represent electric cooperatives and the solar power industry spoke in favor of it last month at a hearing before the House Energy, Utilities and Telecommunications Committee. That panel endorsed the bill on a unanimous vote.

Solar companies have complained that uncertainty about what’s allowed under Georgia law has made it hard to sell homeowners, small businesses, churches and schools on solar financing. More than two dozen other states allow solar companies to cover the cost of new solar systems, own the equipment and then sell the power back to the customers. Often, homeowners pay nothing upfront, then pay solar bills tied to the amount of solar energy they use.




Feminist Aborted Her Son Because He was a Boy: “I Couldn’t Bring Another Monster Into the World”

Feminist Aborted Her Son Because He was a Boy: “I Couldn’t Bring Another Monster Into the World”

Abortion advocates like to pretend that abortion is a tough decision made by women who have no other option, but every now and then an extremist lets slip how radical the beliefs of the pro-abortion movement really are. The latest example is a so-called feminist named Lana, who got pregnant and was happily planning on keeping the baby… until she found out it was a boy, and then she had an abortion, because she couldn’t bring another “monster” into the world.

baby boy

The description of the argument is straight forward: Lana was flying to San Francisco to participate in an Occupy Wall Street rally. When the person sitting next to her found out about it, he swore at her, to which Lana responded by screaming at the top of her lungs “ASSAULT.”

After “contemplating” lying to the flight attendants and telling them that the man struck her, Lana decided to tell the truth. The flight attendants told her that they couldn’t force the man to move in response. And in response to that, Lana decided that she “could no longer depend on men to be an ally of the cause.”

The “cause,” in her mind, is feminism. Soon after, she went to the doctor and was told that she was pregnant with a boy. Her immediate response, she writes, was “my body had betrayed me even worse than the misogynistic suit jockey on the airplane so many months before. I was in shock, I started crying, weeping at the thought of what I was about to curse the world with.”

Over the course of several days, she decided that she could not bring another male into this world. She explains, “I couldn’t bring another monster into the world. We already have enough enemies as it is.”

Yes, because literally all men are inherently monstrous beings who don’t deserve to live. Does she honestly not realize how despicable a viewpoint that is? I wonder how this “feminist” would feel if a man said that all women were inherently monsters, even as babies, and didn’t deserve to live. Somehow, I don’t think she would be all that happy about it.

Cassy Fiano





Scott Walker Calls for Major Changes at University of Wisconsin System

Scott Walker Calls for Major Changes at University of Wisconsin System

MADISON, Wis.—More than 35,000 public employees would be removed from state government rolls if Gov. Scott Walker’s budget proposal stays intact through the legislative process.

Walker’s 2015-17 budget proposal, which was introduced Tuesday, makes major changes to the operation of the state’s University of Wisconsin System. The second-term governor’s plan would split off the system into its own public entity.

By creating a separate authority for the University of Wisconsin System, it would no longer be under the direct management of the state.

According to Walker, University of Wisconsin System supporters have been asking for more autonomy for years, claiming it would help cut costs and better serve students. The Republican governor’s plan also includes a $150 million funding cut in each year of his biennial budget in exchange for the greater autonomy.

The annual reduction is equivalent to a 2.5 percent cut in total public funding. Opponents of Walker’s reform have claimed aid is being cut by 13 percent. That, however, only takes into consideration general fund spending from the state.

The 13 percent figure ignores nearly $5 billion in funding the University of Wisconsin System receives in federal, segregated and program revenues.

At a Wednesday stop in Stevens Point, Walker called the plan an “Act 10 for the UW System”—referring to his 2011 collective-bargaining reforms that have saved the state $3 billion to date.

“What I mean by that is that we actually give them reforms. For years, supporters of the UW System have said at campus after campus that if you got us out from under the thumb of the state government bureaucracy that they could do more to save money and put it back into the classroom to be more effective,” the governor said. “I believe our authority will do just that.”

The proposal would also extend a tuition freeze that was included in the last budget, keeping tuition at the same level for a total of four years.

University of Wisconsin System President Ray Cross hopes the final budget will include more state funding.

“This is a serious cut that will force each institution and campus within the UW System to make difficult decisions about its workforce and programming,” Cross said. “We are hopeful that we will be able to work with our partners in the legislature to mitigate and reduce this cut in the coming months.”

Many others in the state agree with Walker that funding should be cut.

During the 2013-15 budget process, legislators discovered the UW System had more than $600 million in surplus that was not clearly accounted for. This so-called “slush fund” led to the first two-year tuition freeze and eventually the University of Wisconsin System president at the time, Kevin Reilly, resigned.

Since then, the system has reduced reserves down to $175 million and has implemented policies to increase transparency.

Conservatives, including the governor, have also embraced the idea that professors should teach just one more class per semester to cut costs. According to a report from the University of Wisconsin at Madison, faculty taught two courses and had on average just 6.3 hours of direct contact with students per week in 2012.

And, University of Wisconsin at Madison Chancellor Rebecca Blank hinted in Thursday’s Wall Street Journal that number might get even lower.

According to WSJ, “[Blank] said that 15% of her professors last year received outside job offers, and as chancellor, she bids against those offers in part by cutting the course loads of researchers so they will stay.”

The state Legislature will take up Walker’s budget in the coming months and a final bill is expected to be signed by the governor in June.




Moscow & Cairo to drop USD, use national currencies in bilateral trade

Moscow & Cairo to drop USD, use national currencies in bilateral trade – Putin
Published time: February 08, 2015 23:10 
Edited time: February 09, 2015 10:08
Russia's President Vladimir Putin (R) shakes hands with his Egyptian counterpart Abdel Fattah al-Sisi (Reuters / STR)                                         

Russia's President Vladimir Putin (R) shakes hands with his Egyptian counterpart Abdel Fattah al-Sisi (Reuters / STR)

Russia and Egypt might soon exclude the US dollar and use their national currencies in the settlement of accounts in bilateral trade, Russian President Vladimir Putin said in an interview to Egyptian media ahead of his Monday visit to the country.

READ MORE: Iran moves away from US dollar in foreign trade

The issue of abandoning the dollar in trade is “being actively discussed,” Putin told Al-Ahram daily newspaper ahead of his two-day trip to Egypt. The Russian president was invited for a bilateral meeting by his Egyptian counterpart Abdul Fattah al-Sisi. 

“This measure will open up new prospects for trade and investment cooperation between our countries, reduce its dependence on the current trends in the world markets,” Putin said. 

“I should note that we already use national currencies for trade with a number of the CIS [Commonwealth of Independent States] states, and China. This practice proves its worth; we are ready to adopt it in our relations with Egypt as well. This issue is being discussed in substance by relevant agencies of both countries.”

Egypt is a long-time and trusted partner of Russia and the relationship between the two countries has been rapidly developing, the Russian president said. 

“The volume of bilateral trade has increased significantly over the past years: In 2014, it increased by almost half compared to the previous year and amounted to more than $4.5 billion,” he said urging for this trend to be strengthened.

READ MORE: Big investor interest in Russia, despite pressure - president of world’s largest aluminium producer

He also praised the development of “mutually beneficial and effective” cooperation in the sector of agriculture. “Egypt is the major buyer of Russian wheat, Russia provides about 40 percent of grain consumed in the country; as for us, we import fruits and vegetables.” 

Moscow imposed a full ban of EU, US, Australian, Canadian, and Norwegian food exports to Russia on August 7 for one year. Amid Russian sanctions, Egypt said in August that it was ready to boost agricultural deliveries to Russia by 30 percent. 

During 2013, Egypt’s deliveries of agricultural products to Russia amounted $440 million, while during the first half of 2014, Cairo supplied $460 million, said the head of the Ministry of Agriculture of the Russian Federation, Nikolay Fedorov in August 2014. 

Moscow and Cairo are also engaged in energy, automobile manufacturing and transport cooperation, developing the intergovernmental trade, economic and scientific-technical cooperation commission as well. 

During Sisi’s last visit to Russia in August 2014, the two leaders agreed to look at a possibility of creating a free trade zone between Egypt and the countries of the Customs Union. Meeting in the Black Sea resort city of Sochi, the presidents also agreed upon the creation of a Russian industrial zone in Egypt, which will be part of a new Suez Canal project. 

Egypt launched a Suez Canal development project worth $4 billion in August 2014. The project envisages the digging of a new canal parallel to the original built 145 years ago with the aim of speeding up traffic along the existing waterway and boosting the country’s economy.

READ MORE: Russia-China trading settlements in yuan increases 800%




Sunday, February 8, 2015

Time to die: U.N. ads promote killing off the elderly (VIDEO)

Time to die: U.N. ads promote killing off the elderly
Play

Podcast: Play in new window | Download (11.6MB)

Hey all you wrinkly, middle-aged has-beens: Are you ready to move over and let the next generation have your spot on the planet? After all, you’ve lived a good life. And your aging body is going to cost taxpayers a lot more than the salt you think you are worth. In other words, your return-on-investment isn’t looking so good to the United Nations.

In case you haven’t heard, our brains are being conditioned to look upon you as the burden you are. And it’s time you see yourself that way too:

That’s right. The UN is promoting we EUTHANIZE our aging parents. These commercials, of course, aren’t really from the United Nations. But they are designed to point us to the grim reality of Agenda 21, a very real global strategy to reduce the population in the years ahead.  Yes, it sounds like something out of a zombie movie, but it’s been going on now for several years as we’ve been reporting. (Check out this recent interview we did on Agenda 21)

Disguised as environmental stewardship, Agenda 21 is nothing more than repackaged Socialism, and many heavy-hitters with billions of dollars and a worldwide influence are behind it.

Of course the mainstream media has been ignoring this. And only one well-known media outlet — Glenn Beck — has been sounding the alarm. And while we usually don’t include him in our Christian watchman resources, this video is worth a look:

One last video, showing how Agenda 21 will undoubtedly affect the future of the body of Christ:

Related articles


Sent from my iPhone

Saturday, February 7, 2015

The President Finally Acknowledged ISIS is Islamic; You Won’t Believe What He Said Next

The President Finally Acknowledged ISIS is Islamic; You Won’t Believe What He Said Next

At the National Prayer Breakfast, President Obama took the opportunity to address violence in the name of religion after ISIS/ISIL burned Jordanian Air Force pilot Lt. Muath al-Kasasbeh alive. He said it was done by terrorists who “profess to stand up for Islam but instead betray it.”

“From a school in Pakistan to the streets of Paris, we have seen violence and terror perpetrated by people who profess to stand up for faith – their faith – (who) profess to stand up for Islam but in fact are betraying it. You see ISIL, a brutal, vicious death cult that in the name of religion carried out unspeakable acts of barbarism, terrorizing religious minorities like the Yezidis, subjecting women to rape as a weapon of war, and claiming the mantle of religious authority for such actions.’

Then the President highlighted injustices and brutal acts done in the name of Christianity.

“Lest we get on our high horse and think this is unique to some other place, remember that during the Crusades and the Inquisition, people committed terrible deeds in the name of Christ.
In our home country, slavery and Jim Crow all too often was justified in the name of Christ.”

What are your thoughts on Obama’s remarks?  Please leave a comment.

H/T: The Daily Mail

Share





Dave Brat, R-Va., breaks the stereotype of corporate Republicanism.

Dave Brat: America’s bottom 80 percent is sinking

Dave Brat: America’s bottom 80 percent is sinking
AP file photo      

FRESH BLOOD: U.S. Rep. Dave Brat, R-Va., breaks the stereotype of corporate Republicanism.

By Kenric Ward | Watchdog.org Virginia Bureau

SPOTSYLVANIA, Va. – U.S. Rep. Dave Brat says he wants to be the “most boring guy in Congress.” That doesn’t mean the freshman congressman is quietly going along to get along.

The populist Republican who knocked out House Majority Leader Eric Cantor last fall in a stunning Virginia primary says his first eight weeks on Capitol Hill “seemed like 14 years.”

“I’m even more in favor of term limits,” the former Randolph-Macon College professor said.

“We need some big, big changes,” Brat told Watchdog.org in an interview. But he said he sees no sign of things turning around as long as D.C. remains mired in politics as usual.

“I’m a macro-economic guy,” the former economics and ethics instructor said. “I vote no if it’s bad for the country.”

Citing recent examples, the 7th Congressional District lawmaker opposed the bloated Cromnibusspending bill, as well as funding for the Export-Import Bank, derisively known as “Boeing’s Bank” for its corporate dealings. He also voted against returning John Boehner as House speaker, while managing to hold onto his seats at the budget, education and workforce committees when the Ohio Republican was re-elected.

Brat urges conservatives – and Americans at large — to stay focused on “big issues.”

“The Keystone pipeline is symbolic. Don’t over-hype it. What’s most important is speeding up the whole economy,” he said.

In that vein, Brat said the country would be better served by “getting rid of the EPA, which is killing off small businesses.”

Defying corporatist conservatives and libertarians alike, Brat calls illegal immigration a linchpin to the coming elections.

“When you increase the supply of cheap labor by 12 million workers through amnesty, wages go down,” he said.

Sounding more like firebrand Democratic Massachusetts U.S. Sen. Elizabeth Warren than buttoned-down Mitt Romney, the GOP congressman notes, “The bottom 80 percent of American workers are losing. This is what 2016 is all about: Who’s really going to help the middle class?”

While Brat and Warren talk tough about crony capitalism, he parts company with the Massachusetts liberal on policy. “They have no solutions,” Brat said of Warren and other statist Democrats. “We do.”

The prescription, he said, starts with smaller government, free markets and, most importantly, the rule of law. If voting that way is boring or discommodes the Republican establishment, so be it.

“I ran on economics, and everyone is going to know how I’m going to vote because I follow the Constitution. It’s about what’s good for the country — not what’s good for special interests.”

Kenric Ward is a national reporter for Watchdog.org and chief of the Virginia Bureau. Contact him at kenric@watchdogvirginia.org or at (571) 319-9824. @Kenricward



Sent from my iPhone