One woman's tough and tender approach to grassroots conservative principles in an era of unreasonable logic from those who claim progressive strategies but fail to heed how those same strategies have failed miserably throughout history.
"Be wise as serpents ... harmless as doves."
Hillary Clinton keeps bashing the Trump tax plan as "trumped-up trickle-down economics." This class-warfare card has become the standard and tired response to every Republican tax reform plan for 30 years. No wonder we haven't cleaned out the stables of the tax code since the Reagan era. Democrats have no interest in doing so.
Clinton's claim is that the plan will blow a hole in the debt (which is rich coming from someone who worked for an administration that nearly doubled the debt in eight years) and that the benefits all go to the rich. She also says it will cost jobs and could even cause a recession.
I worked on devising the Trump tax plan with economists Larry Kudlow, Sam Clovis and others, so I know a little bit about the costs and the benefits.
The Democrats subscribe to an amazing ideology that says that letting businesses keep more of their own money will cause the economy to capsize but a $1.5 trillion tax hike on businesses and investors will create jobs. Yes, and injecting Elmer's glue into your veins is a good way to prevent a heart attack.
Let's start with her claim that the plan will cost $5 trillion. That's wrong. When taking into account the higher economic growth from the lower tax rates on businesses and workers, the plan's "cost" is about half that size.
The Tax Foundation finds the plan will raise the GDP growth rate by almost 1 percentage point over a decade, and that means lots of jobs and additional tax revenue for the government. The best way to balance the budget is to put Americans back to work.
The $2.5 trillion "cost" of the tax cut can and will easily be made up by cutting government spending. Over the next decade the government is expected to spend almost $50 trillion. Surely, with sound, business-like leadership, we can save 5 cents on the dollar.
Next, she says that tax cuts have never worked to revive the economy. We believe that cutting taxes for 26 million small businesses will be a huge incentive for more hiring and expansion by businesses that are now taxed at as high as 40 percent. The American Enterprise Institute finds that the biggest beneficiary of a business tax cut is the American worker, whose wages will go up from more capital spending. If a trucking company goes from 50 trucks to 75, that's 25 more truckers it will need to hire.
Clinton needs a tax-cut history lesson. "Supply-side" tax rates were at the heart of the Reagan economic plan in the 1980s. The Reagan expansion, with lower taxes, was twice as powerful as the anemic Obama recovery, with higher taxes and more government spending. The difference in the two recoveries is nearly $3 trillion in lost output. Similarly, the John F. Kennedy tax cuts got us 5 and 6 percent growth. JFK was right: The best way to raise revenues is to "cut tax rates now." Even Bill Clinton agreed to a capital gains tax cut, which led to a gusher of new federal revenues.
Next, Clinton claims that only rich people such as Trump himself will benefit from this "trumped up" tax plan. She obviously hasn't read the tax plan. By design, the tax rate reductions for the rich are offset almost dollar for dollar by the loss of $250 billion a year in tax deductions for rich people. So, the overall tax burden of most millionaires and billionaires is not changed. Almost all of the benefit in dollar terms from the tax plan goes to the middle class (and owners of small businesses). We think they deserve a break after a decade that has wiped out financial savings of the middle class. With Obamacare premiums rising by 10 to 30 percent in many states this year, families need the tax cut desperately.
The nonpartisan Tax Foundation calculates that the Trump tax plan causes a rise of after-tax income by about 8 percent, or $4,000 for the average middle-class household, while the Clinton plan shrinks incomes.
What Clinton isn't telling you is that she and her liberal friends are against tax cuts because they want to spend the money on "free" everything. This includes the silliest idea of all time: hundreds of billions for 500 million solar panels. Get ready for a cascade of dozens of new Solyndras. How much money is going to go to Elon Musk from this corporate-welfare giveaway? It could be in the tens of billions of dollars. So, whose policies benefit the rich and the political class?
Hillary Clinton is offering the American people trickle-down government.
School District Bans Jesus, Bibles, Angels & Prayer
By Todd Starnes
Jesus just got kicked out of public schools in Henry County, Georgia.
The school district fired off a directive to school administrators ordering them to eradicate anything remotely religious from all public school buildings.
One of my readers sent me a copy of the directive from the Henry County School District that was relayed to the staff at East Lake Elementary School.
“You are hereby directed to remove all items which contain religious symbols, such as crosses, printed bibles, angels, bible verses, printed prayers, and biblical quotations from the common areas, hallways, classrooms, and office of East Lake Elementary School,” the edict read.
“Further…religious and biblical references should not be included in notes to parents, email signature lines, or any other correspondence sent on behalf of East Lake Elementary School,” the edict continued.
But the Henry County School District wasn’t quite finished with their orders to eradicate religion from the school house.
“Finally, please remember that all references to holiday parties should comply with the Henry County School District’s Policy, Procedure and Practices for Holidays,” the edict concluded.
Something tells me there won’t be any Nativity Scenes in Henry County public schools.
District spokesman J.D. Hardin confirmed the authenticity of the directive – sent to administrators on Monday.
“It was not intended as something that was supposed to be shared or put out with public consumption,” he told me. “It was more of a directive for our administrators to remind their employees of this particular law that is in pace as dictated by the federal government.”
Mr. Hardin seems to think the U.S. Constitution mandates that teachers must voluntarily relinquish their rights at the school house door.
“The Establishment Clause stipulates that the government may not promote or affiliate itself with any religious doctrine or organization,” he said. “Henry County Schools is a government entity.”
Mr. Hardin stressed that the directive covers all religions – but it’s pretty clear only one was being targeted.
The edict made no mention of the Koran or prayer rugs. I’m just trying to keep it real, folks.
The school district will still allow teachers to wear religious jewelry – so long as it’s not “overt or way out there.”
“They can wear things that are small trinkets,” Mr. Hardin explained.
Bibles and Bible verses are a big no-no.
“They cannot have a Bible sitting on top of their desk or they cannot have some other type of religious doctrine sitting on their desk,” he said.
So what about the library? Would they also ban the Bible from the library?
“That’s a good question,” Mr. Hardin said. “I don’t know that we have any Bibles within our libraries.”
Now, if this is beginning to sound like some sort of Soviet-era religious cleansing, you aren’t alone.
Truett-McConnell is a Christian university based in north Georgia --- known for its education degree.
“It seems like the school system wishes to eradicate any form of religious expression except for their own atheist and secular views,” Caner told me.
He wondered if the district would forbid young Jewish men from wearing yarmulkes or young Muslim women from wearing hijabs.
“Or are they simply targeting Christians and discriminating against them,” he asked.
So how is Truett-McConnell preparing its education students to teach in public school classrooms that are hostile to Christianity?
“We are preparing educators with a biblical worldview to love your neighbor as yourself, to esteem others better than themselves,” he said. “But perhaps a secularist will outlaw that one day as well.”
And if they do?
“If they do, our students know to stand for Christ and not culture – regardless of the consequences,” he replied.
BREAKING: Thousand of Illegal Aliens Registered to Vote in THIS STATE!
Even though they are officially “ineligible,” thousands of illegal immigrants are fully registered to vote in the state of Virginia, thanks to their Moter Voter program.
Apparently, Virginia isn’t just for lovers… It’s also for voter fraud!
This bombshell study from the Public Interest Legal Foundation shows that in 9 counties alone, 1,046 non-alien citizens were registered to vote thanks to the program and the National Voter Registration Act of 1983.
The Motor Voter law requires that everyone who receives drivers license applicants must be given the chance to register to vote simply by checking a box on the form.
These illegal voters were only caught by accident… which raises the question: How many more illegal immigrants are also registered? If they wouldn’t have admitted their illegal status, no one would know today.
Voter ID won’t even stop them, because these illegal aliens are given drivers licenses when they register their cars. Clearly, this is just the tip of the iceberg:
The report also reveals some of these aliens have been casting ballots. From the report:
Even in this small sample, when the voting history of this small sample of alien registrants is examined, nearly 200 verified ballots were cast before they were removed from the rolls. Each one of them is likely a felony. Again, this is from just a small sampling of Virginia counties. Each of the aliens we have discovered to have registered or voted has likely committed a felony. Will the Justice Department act now that their names, registration records and dates of voting are herein provided? This is in a state where Republican Mark Obenshain lost his race for Attorney General in 2013 by 165 votes. Mark Herring, the Democrat who beat him, has distinguished himself by bringing Eric Holder-style lawlessness to the Commonwealth of Virginia.
But alas we don’t have the full story because the state electoral board instructed local election officials to cover it up. The PILF report:
The responses [to records requests] were nearly identical and soon it became clear that they were orchestrated by Edgardo Cortes, the Commissioner of the Virginia Department of Elections, and an appointee of Governor McAuliffe. According to numerous county election officials, Commissioner Cortes had issued guidance to them, instructing them not to respond to our requests for records pertaining to non-citizen voters. Some election officials kindly provided us the original communications from Cortes. Cortes was an employee of the Advancement Project before his time as a state employee.
This is why Democrats always fight against laws which limit voter fraud. They know a vast majority that could sneak through the voting registration system would vote for Hillary Clinton and other lower-ballot Democrat candidates.
This is how a political party can steal elections. It’s essential to protect the ballot and ensure that only American citizens can vote.
Share this story with your friends on Facebook and Twitter… America must be alert to the massive voter fraud happening NOW!
Leo Hohmann is a news editor for WND. He has been a reporter and editor at several suburban newspapers in the Atlanta and Charlotte, North Carolina, areas and also served as managing editor of Triangle Business Journal in Raleigh, North Carolina.
The Muslim Community Center of Ann Arbor and Vicinity has won a $1.7 million settlement from Pittsfield Township, Michigan, which denied the mosque a permit to build an Islamic School on 77 acres.
A Michigan community being sued by the Obama Justice Department and CAIR for rejecting the construction of a large Islamic school has agreed to settle out of court for $1.7 million and allow the project to go forward.
The tentative settlement agreed to by Pittsfield Township would be one of the largest cash payouts ever by a U.S. municipality to a mosque. The deal could send shock waves throughout the nation among communities fighting to keep large mosques and madrasas out of residential areas.
Shaykh Moataz Al-Hallak emigrated to the U.S. from Syria and founded mosques in Texas, Maryland and Michigan. The FBI has investigated him in the past for ties to terrorists but never found sufficient evidence to warrant an arrest.
The settlement grants an Ann Arbor-based mosque led by a Syrian imam the right to build a 70,000-square-foot Islamic school, a residential development consisting of 22 duplex units and three single-family homes, plus a park, the Detroit News reported.
Shaykh Moataz Al-Hallak migrated to the U.S. from Syria in the 1980s and has been organizing and leading mosques ever since. The New York Times reported on Sept. 18, 2001, that Al-Hallak was “a Muslim cleric suspected of ties to the Osama bin Laden organization” and that he had been banned from preaching at a Texas mosque because he was “considered by some congregants as having an overly rigid interpretation of Muslim theology.”
But he has found a home in Michigan and is poised to greatly expanding his influence after this week’s settlement, a deal he won with the full backing of the U.S. Department of Justice.
Pittsfield Township not only agreed to pay $1.7 million and allow the project to move forward, but it also agreed to have its elected leaders and staff receive sensitivity training in how not to discriminate against Muslims or any other religious minorities.
The Pittsfield case, by the sheer amount of the payout, could have a chilling effect on any city or town considering a mosque location or expansion, say legal experts. Many such legal battles are in process, including a major one in nearby Sterling Heights, Michigan, reported recently by WND.
“It’s not surprising,” said Karen Lugo, a constitutional law attorney with expertise in the federal Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act, a federal statute under which the Michigan Muslims claimed discrimination.
“With a RLUIPA lawsuit by the time many municipalities get to the point where there has been court proceedings and settlement negotiations the attorney fees that the municipality would have to pay in a losing court judgment are so formidable that even a costly settlement looks appealing,” said Lugo.
Lugo added that when the DOJ enters the case against a city, that adds more pressure to settle. At that point the city’s lawyers “would anticipate that legal proceedings would continue to be prolonged and even more costly,” she said.
Pittsfield Township, a community just outside of Ann Arbor, denied the construction permit saying the project would be incompatible with the surrounding residential zoning and would cause undue traffic and congestion.
But the owner of the property, a Shariah-compliant Ann Arbor mosque backed by the Council on American-Islamic Relations or CAIR, filed suit against Pittsfield Township in 2012.
The U.S. Justice Department joined the case last year on the side of the mosque, claiming Pittsfield was violating RLUIPA, a law passed by Congress in 2000 that prohibits local governments from imposing zoning regulations that “substantially burden” religious rights “unless there is a compelling government interest.”
CAIR gets involved
CAIR, a spinoff of the extremist Muslim Brotherhood and an unindicted co-conspirator in the Holy Land Foundation terror-funding trial in 2007-08, gloated about the settlement in statements given to the Detroit News Thursday.
“We welcome the settlement with Pittsfield Township and hope the outcome of this case will serve as a deterrent to other municipalities throughout the country seeking to deny Muslim institutions the right to build or expand their facilities on the basis of religion,” said Lena Masri, CAIR-Michigan’s legal director.
“In a year when so much has gone wrong for the Muslim community, this settlement is an example of the good things that can happen when Muslim communities stand up for their rights,” said Gadeir Abbas, who served as co-counsel on the case.
The applicant in the Pittsfield case is the Muslim Community Association of Ann Arbor and Vicinity, which is led by imam Moataz Al-Hallak, an immigrant from Syria who has been under FBI investigation in the past for suspected radical ties.
According to his official bio on the mosque website, Al-Hallak memorized the Quran at a young age and received an Ijazah [certificate] in 1979 from a leading authority in qira’aat, which represents the verbal recitation of the Quran.
He has served as an imam in the U.S. since 1986, having founded or led mosques in Arlington, Texas; Bowie, Maryland, and Ann Arbor, Michigan. Moataz has, according to his mosque’s website:
Founded and built the first full time Islamic school in North Texas
Founding member of the Islamic Society of Arlington, Texas
Founding member of several national Islamic organizations
He also currently:
Serves as an advisory member on the Fatwa standing committee of the Assembly of Muslim Jurists in North America
Serves on the board of directors of the Islamic Shura Council of South Michigan
Serves on the board of directors of the Muslim Social Services
His mosque in Ann Arbor requires Muslim women to be veiled and requires them to pray in a separate room adjacent to the main prayer hall where only men are allowed, according to its website.
As part of the government settlement, which must still be approved by the U.S. District Court in Detroit, the township has agreed to permit the academy to construct a school, to treat the school and all other religious groups equally and to publicize its nondiscrimination policies and practices, federal officials said.
In addition, the township will report periodically to the U.S. Justice Department, the Detroit News reported.
“Federal law protects the religious beliefs, freedoms and practices of all communities, including the right to build religious institutions free from unlawful and unfair barriers,” said Vanita Gupta, head of the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division.
“This agreement will allow the Michigan Islamic Academy to build the facility it needs to serve its members and contribute to the community of Pittsfield.”
Obama DOJ going after cities that reject mosques
The Department of Justice has been more aggressive under President Obama in investigating what it considers to be discriminatory zoning practices against mosques and Islamic schools.
Cities reject churches and synagogues almost every day in one city or another. But fewer of those rejections are ending up in federal litigation while the mosque rejections are increasing.
The percentage of federal RLUIPA investigations involving mosques or Islamic schools has risen from 15 percent in the 2000 to August 2010 period to 38 percent during the September 2010 to present period, according to a DOJ report posted on July 27.
The Pittsfield Township settlement, while one of the largest ever won by a mosque against a municipality in America, is not the only large settlement in recent years. Some have included not only cash but free land, Lugo said.
“In my opinion I would not characterize it as the largest knowing that there are some other municipalities that have contributed land so their settlement package may be larger but this certainly ranks as one of largest.”
The settlement still needs court approval.
A lesson for other cities
Lugo said if cities begin to engage in RLUIPA’s “safe harbor” provision before they have a religious application filed they stand a much better chance of defending their residential areas against a large project like that proposed in Pittsfield Township.
“The ‘safe harbor’ provision suggests that cities can designate areas within their jurisdiction where they make it easier for a religious application to succeed while at the same time creating zoning that prioritizes the residential or industrial character of a zoned district and makes it more difficult for an assembly or religious use to come in. You create hurdles like traffic-count standards, noise volume levels, parking requirements, etc. with generally an interest in limiting volume and activity.”
She said municipalities have learned from examples like Dar El Farooq mosque in Bloomington, Minnesota, that when an Islamic school is prescribed on a zoning application the reality may become not just a K-12 program but also university classes, weekend seminars and support services “that run into the very late hours of the night.”
One of the unavoidable consequences of youth is the tendency to think behavior we see today has always been. I'd like to dispute that vision, at least as it pertains to black people.
I graduated from Philadelphia's Benjamin Franklin High School in 1954. Franklin's predominantly black students were from the poorest North Philadelphia neighborhoods. During those days, there were no policemen patrolling the hallways. Today close to 400 police patrol Philadelphia schools. There were occasional after-school fights — rumbles, as we called them — but within the school, there was order. In contrast with today, students didn't use foul language to teachers, much less assault them.
Places such as the Richard Allen housing project, where I lived, became some of the most dangerous and dysfunctional places in Philadelphia. Mayhem — in the form of murders, shootings and assaults — became routine. By the 1980s, residents found that they had to have window bars and multiple locks. The 1940s and '50s Richard Allen project, as well as other projects, bore no relation to what they became. Many people never locked their doors; windows weren't barred. We did not go to bed with the sound of gunshots. Most of the residents were two-parent families with one or both parents working.
How might one explain the greater civility of Philadelphia and other big-city, predominantly black neighborhoods and schools during earlier periods compared with today? Would anyone argue that during the '40s and '50s, there was less racial discrimination and poverty? Was academic performance higher because there were greater opportunities? Was civility in school greater in earlier periods because black students had more black role models in the form of black principals, teachers and guidance counselors? That's nonsense, at least in northern schools. In my case, I had no more than three black teachers throughout primary and secondary school.
Starting in the 1960s, the values that made for civility came under attack. Corporal punishment was banned. This was the time when the education establishment and liberals launched their agenda that undermined lessons children learned from their parents and the church. Sex education classes undermined family/church strictures against premarital sex. Lessons of abstinence were ridiculed, considered passe, and replaced with lessons about condoms, birth control pills and abortion. Further undermining of parental authority came with legal and extralegal measures to assist teenage abortions, often with neither parental knowledge nor parental consent.
Customs, traditions, moral values and rules of etiquette are behavioral norms, transmitted mostly by example, word of mouth and religious teachings. As such, they represent a body of wisdom distilled through the ages by experience and trial and error. The nation's liberals — along with the education establishment, pseudo-intellectuals and the courts — have waged war on traditions, customs and moral values. Many people have been counseled to believe that there are no moral absolutes. Instead, what's moral or immoral is a matter of personal convenience, personal opinion, what feels good or what is or is not criminal.
We no longer condemn or shame self-destructive and rude behavior, such as out-of-wedlock pregnancies, dependency, cheating and lying. We have replaced what worked with what sounds good. The abandonment of traditional values has negatively affected the nation as a whole, but blacks have borne the greater burden. This is seen by the decline in the percentage of black two-parent families. Today a little over 30 percent of black children live in an intact family, where as early as the late 1800s, over 70 percent did. Black illegitimacy in 1938 was 11 percent, and that for whites was 3 percent. Today it's respectively 73 percent and 30 percent.
It is the height of dishonesty, as far as blacks are concerned, to blame our problems on slavery, how white people behave and racial discrimination. If those lies are not exposed, we will continue to look for external solutions when true solutions are internal. Those of us who are old enough to know better need to expose these lies.
Walter E. Williams is a professor of economics at George Mason University. To find out more about Walter E. Williams and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate webpage at www.creators.com.
At the time of this writing, less than 3,000 people have seen a damning video of Hillary Clinton addressing the radical activist-left Netroots Nation (#nn16) conference.
In the video, Hillary Clinton:
claimed that police officers are killing black children,
said she wants to earmark $1 billion dollars in her first budget to combat “implicit bias, which remains a problem across our society and even in the best of our police departments,”
encouraged left-wing bloggers, socialists and community organizers to engage in a vile left-wing (and often successful) tactic of strategic litigation by “seek[ing] out cases to challenge Citizen’s United in the courts,” so that she can bolster a case for a constitutional amendment to overturn the supreme court’s ruling.
This is one of the most insane videos that you never saw:
Here is the transcript:
“Hello Netroots Nation,
Thanks for putting progressive issues front and center in this election, and every election for more than a decade. And thanks, too, for shining a spotlight on the urgent, pressing challenge of criminal justice reform. It’s been nearly two years since Michael Brown was killed in Ferguson. With the help of activists including those in the Black Lives Matter movement, our country is truly engaged in a difficult but critical conversation about systemic racism and injustice. But now we need to turn talk into action. Last week’s tragedies only underscore the urgency of end-to-end criminal justice reform and stopping the tragedy of black men and women and black children being killed by police or dying in custody.
I’ve laid out a comprehensive reform agenda. Now I’m proposing two additional steps. First, as president, I’ll bring law enforcement and communities together to develop national guidelines on the use of force. Second, I will target one billion dollars in my first budget to take on implicit bias, which remains a problem across our society and even in the best of our police departments. I’m proud that for the first time, the democratic platform addresses these issues in a comprehensive way and that we have developed the most progressive platform in our party’s history.
Now I know, many of the people in this room supported Senator Sanders in the primary. I’m looking forward to hearing from you, learning from you, and working with you. You’ve helped put political and campaign finance reform at the top of the national agenda and I intend to keep it there.
Today, I’m announcing that in my first thirty days as president, I will propose a constitutional amendment to overturn Citizen’s United and give the American people – all of us – the chance to reclaim our democracy. I will also appoint supreme court justices who understand that this decision was a disaster for our democracy and I will fight for other progressive reforms including small dollar matching and disclosure requirements.
I hope some of the brilliant minds in this room will seek out cases to challenge Citizen’s United in the courts because I know I can’t do this alone. We need you to keep speaking out, keep organizing, and keep holding elected officials – including me – accountable.
We know what happens when progressive voices get drowned out by the other side and we cannot let that happen. So I’m looking forward to fighting along side you and Senator Sanders in the weeks, months, and years to come. Because you know what? We are stronger together. Thank you all very much.”
"Last night a friend claimed that Donald Trump wouldn’t make a good president; he is brash, he is racist, he is a loudmouth; you know the normal things people learn to recite after being programmed by television news. The one I loved was that, “Trump is arrogant.” My friend questioned if one man could make “that much difference in the world today.” To my friend's credit, she was respectful enough to let me respond when she asked, “Really, what has Trump done?”
I said, “In June of last year, Trump entered the race for president. In just a little over a year, Trump has single handedly defeated the Republican party. He did so thoroughly. In fact, he did so in such a resounding way that the Republican Party now suffers from an identity crisis. He literally dismantled the party. Trump even dismantled and dismissed the brand and value of the Bush family.
Trump has Obama petrified that Trump will dismiss programs that weren’t properly installed using proper law.
Trump has single handedly debunked and disemboweled any value of news media as we knew it—news now suffering from an all-time level of distrust and disrespect.
Trump has leaders from all over the world talking about him, whether good or bad. Trust me, powerful men who have been president before weren’t liked by the global community. I doubt Mikhail Gorbachev liked Reagan when Reagan said, "Tear down that wall."
Trump has expressly disclosed the fraud perpetrated on the American public by Hillary Clinton. He has, quite literally, brought Hillary to her knees—if you believe that nervous tension and disorders offer physical side effects and damage.
Trump has unified the silent majority in a way that should be patently frightening to “liberals.”
As the press accuses Trump of being a house of cards, Trump has proven the press is the real house of cards. He has whipped up the entire establishment into pure panic. Trump has exposed them for who they are and worse, what they are. George Clooney was right when he said Trump draws live news coverage of his podium that he’s not yet approached. Thanks, George, you were perfectly correct.
What we see as headline news today are actually the last bubbles from the ship that is now sunk—meaning the standard news media, as a propaganda machine, has been exposed. They have no more value.
In the same way Trump asked the African-American community this question, I asked my friend, ”At this point, what do you have to lose?” We have mass cop shootings, riots in our streets, ambushed cops, double digit inflation, bombs blowing up in our cities, targeted police, #BLM, a skyrocketing jobless rate, no economic growth, privately owned land being seized by the federal government, the worst racial tension in my lifetime, no God in schools, more abortions than ever, illegal aliens pouring into our country, sick veterans receiving no care, and a debt that doubled in seven years to $19 trillion. Are you really happy with the condition of the current system?
One man has done all of this in one year—one guy, and on his own dime. And with everything I’ve written above, you believe Trump hasn't done anything? You claim that you are afraid of Donald Trump? No wonder we’re in trouble. You can say that Trump is a lousy presidential candidate. That’s your right. Just don’t ever say he’s not effective.
That Megan Kelly, FOX News, CNN, MSNBC, Washington Post, Rachel Maddow, the Huffington Post, the New York Times, Raleigh’s News and Observer, the AP, Don Lemon, Jake Tapper, and many more, failed to implement their collectively orchestrated lie on the American people against Trump, is actually a massive testament to Trump. The press colluded pure propaganda to accomplish his demise … and they have collectively failed and miserably.
Here's just one example of how badly America is injured right now. There are high school football players on their knees during the national anthem simply because the press used as propaganda to program those kids to do that very thing. But, these kids are mimicking NFL stars the same way the same kids chooses which brand of football shoe to purchase—they're overtly brain-washed to do that very thing.
Now, we have a generation of children who hate America.
America’s problem isn’t that little children are on their knee in collective disrespect of America. Our problem is that America is on her knee from collective disrespect by Americans.
You can disrespect America all you want. But, it’s high-time you respect the silent majority. Because they’re not simply the “silent majority” as you’ve been trained to believe when Hillary calls them “deplorables.” The fact is, they are simply the majority. And now they're no longer silent either. Donald Trump changed all of that, single-handedly and within one year." From Be Forbes."
Bebe Coe Bertino
9/29/2016 , this is a copy and paste, and needs to be read and spread!! #onpoint
