Showing posts with label Sharia. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Sharia. Show all posts

Wednesday, April 15, 2015

Sharia Outlawed by Just 1 Vote in This Southern State

Sharia Outlawed by Just 1 Vote in This Southern State


Screen Shot 2015-03-24 at 11.25.54 AMThe United States of America is to be governed under the guiding principles of only one doctrine, the U.S. Constitution.

It’s crazy how often people forget that.

But with the growth of Islam in the U.S., lawmakers are continually forced to remind people that the Constitution supersedes all other kind of laws, even religious.

This is especially true of Sharia law.

And in Texas it was only by the slimmest of margins that Sharia was relegated to a position of no-consequence as a city council vote barely passed 5-4 to uphold the Constitution as the supreme law of the land.

Joe Saunders reported on the historic vote:

Cheers erupted in the city council meeting room in Irving, Texas, last week as the city passed an ordinance to make sure foreign laws would never replace America’s or Texas laws – but the city’s Muslim activists weren’t happy.

That’s because the 5-4 vote supported a proposed state law that was inspired by the establishment of a Muslim tribunal in Irving that supporters say is meant only to help local Muslims use Islamic laws to settle domestic disputes, but critics say is the first step to getting Sharia law implemented in Texas.

“The elephant in the room in that it’s the anti-Sharia bill,” one activist told the local CBS station.

Irving Mayor Beth Van Duyne is an outspoken opponent of the Muslim tribunal and the possibility of Sharia law in the United States, but stressed during Thursday’s council meeting that the ordinance did not mention Sharia by name, or any other religion.

The point, she said, was that American and state civil laws reign supreme – and no foreign law has standing.

“Respect them, obey them, embrace them,” she said.

While the United States was founded on principles that allowed people to practice their own religion, nowhere does it allow room for laws that are practiced in theocratic institutions.

What Muslims don’t want to admit is Sharia isn’t just an inner faith law system. It’s a law system that works hand in hand with government.

As soon as Sharia creeps its way into the law politic, well, then you’ve got yourself a Taliban or a Caliphate.

And no free country can be ruled under these laws, no matter how hard they argue it isn’t true.

Good on Texas for doing the right thing.


Sponsored From Around the Web


This post was written by Survival Joe on Tuesday, March 24, 2015 and tagged as: , , 



Friday, November 15, 2013

LEFT TO ITSELF, ISLAM WILL CONTINUE TO PREVAIL

KARZAI PUTS TALIBAN IN CHARGE OF WOMEN’S RIGHTS


Jul 3, 2013 1 Comment Jake Hammer

Trust me ……..said the spider to the fly.

Excerpted from REUTERS

KABUL – Just 16 years ago, Abdul Rahman Hotak helped prop one of the world’s most austere regimes for women as a newspaper editor and bureaucrat for the Taliban. Now, as a one of Afghanistan’s top human rights protectors, he says he has turned a corner.

Sitting in a small grassed yard outside his new office at the Afghanistan’s Independent Human Rights Commission, Hotak insists on being a voice in favor of hard-won women’s rights in the deeply conservative country, still ranked as one of the world’s most dangerous places to be born a girl.

“Unfortunately there are many people who are against women in this country, many of whom I’ve worked with in the past,” the heavily bearded Hotak told Reuters in a rare interview, passionately gesturing under a dark striped turban.

“As a commissioner, I will continue to work with women rights activists to lessen the burden and plight of Afghan women.”

President Hamid Karzai’s naming of Hotak among five new rights commissioners has raised questions about his commitment to protecting women as most international combat troops leave the country and his government looks to fragile negotiations with the Taliban.

Hotak’s controversial past, including rumors of having been an aide to the Taliban’s one-eyed leader, Mullah Mohammad Omar, has raised alarm from civil rights activists including the New York-based Human Rights Watch and U.N. rights commissions.

Even before the Taliban emerged a formidable post-civil war force in 1994, Hotak was the editor-in-chief of the Taliban’s ‘Afghan Sunrise’ newspaper in southern Kandahar province, where the Islamist movement was founded.

Hotak denies serving directly under Omar, and says he joined the radical movement in its early days to “serve his country” and help it recover from decades of bloody civil war that had left much of Kabul in ruins.

But he says he never agreed with much of the oppressive ideology during Taliban rule between 1996 and 2001 which barred women from almost all work and education, as well as voting, decreeing them un-Islamic and imposing harsh punishment for infringements.

“Everyone in Afghanistan had links with one group or another and I am not exceptional,” Hotak said.

Even Sima Samar, the chair of the independent human rights commission and a perpetual Nobel Peace Prize nominee, has questioned Hotak’s appointment, warning it could breach commitments to international backers as a condition of aid made at last year’s Tokyo donor summit.

Samar, who won renown as a fierce opponent of the head-to-toe covering burqa for women, said the appointment risked damaging the credibility of the nine-member commission, appointed by Karzai but which acts independently.

UN Human Rights chief Navi Pillay also warned that the latest appointments compromised the commission’s political independence and effectiveness.

Many Afghan women feel they may bear the brunt of efforts to bring insurgents into a political settlement to end the 12-year NATO-led war, with a step back to some of the conditions they faced before the U.S.-backed overthrow of Taliban rule in 2001.

In the 12 years since, women have regained basic rights and made steps towards more effective political representation with a quarter of seats in the parliament reserved for females. The government has also tried to recruit more women into the police and military.

Hotak, in a possible gesture of moderation, agreed to shake hands with a female reporter, which is unusual for past or present members of the Taliban in Afghanistan.

But he also voiced skepticism about new Elimination of Violence against Women legislation in preparation since 2005 which has sparked a furore in parliament. If passed, the bills would outlaw forced or underage marriage, as well as rape and violence against women, including within families.

“Our third amendment says no law can violate Islam, but now we have this law violating Islam,” Hotak said. “A law needs to be made so Muslims and civil society can accept it, so people feel comfortable with the law.”

Religious-leaning lawmakers have previously objected to at least eight of the 22 articles in the legislation, including keeping the legal age for women to marry at 16, the existence of shelters for domestic abuse victims and the halving of the number of wives permitted to two.



Sent from my iPhone