Wednesday, February 4, 2015

Rutgers Law Prof Who Says Pedophilia Is Not a Crime

Q&A: Rutgers Law Prof Who Says Pedophilia Is Not a Crime

margo-kaplan-pedophilia-q-a-940x540

Margo Kaplan is not very popular today. In the Monday edition of the New York Times, the Rutgers-Camden law professor, an NYU and Harvard graduate, takes to the op-ed pages to argue that we’ve got it all wrong when it comes to pedophilia. She writes that pedophiles don’t necessarily turn out to be child molesters and that pedophilia is not a choice, i.e. a pedophile might be born that way. We reached her in her office in Camden to discuss.

pedophilia-not-a-crime-rutgers-margo-kaplanYou really lit up the comments section of the op-ed page today.
Yes, but I have to be honest. I am getting more emails of support than I ever expected. I’m shocked. I expected to get maybe 95% negative emails, but I’ve gotten so many positive ones. The online comments, though, are pretty uniformly negative, and a lot of people haven’t even read the article.




I know your pain. Who are you getting these positive emails from?
A lot of people I don't even know. There's a former prosecutor, a judge, a nurse. Individuals with family members who have pedophilia.

How much of the population has pedophilia?
We're not entirely sure, but the estimates are around one-percent of the male population, and those in the female population are assumed to be much smaller. As far as the number of people with pedophilia who do sex offend and who do not, there are a lot of assumptions but very little data, because we have very little treatment, very little information.

Why is that?
There is so much stigma. There is very little reason to come forth and identify as a pedophile. There are no large scale studies, no large treatment programs, no big research studies on this. I contacted the National Institutes of Health, and they don't spend any money on pedophilia.

But you are basically saying, hey, let's take it easy on pedophiles.
Well, but I am not saying that about sex offenders. I say that they remain responsible for their conduct. We need to treat pedophiles before they offend. People see the word "pedophile" and think "sex offender." People choose to sex offend children. They do not choose to be pedophiles.

Since you say there are so many misconceptions, why don't you tell us what a pedophile really is.
A person with an intense and recurrent sexual attraction to prepubescent children, children who have not yet entered any form of puberty. And according to the DSM [Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders], it constitutes a mental disorder when you act on it, but not just that. It also constitutes a mental disorder if it causes "marked distress or interpersonal difficulty," and, as you can imagine, pedophilia will cause this.

In your article, you open by saying that as a pedophile's numerical age increases into teenage years and then adulthood, the numerical age of those he is attracted to does not. Are most pedophiles really starting that young?
For many individuals, it is really an onset in adolescence, similar to how many sexual attractions happen. Individuals who are heterosexual, you realize you are attracted to the opposite sex when you are a kid. For a pedophile, you get older, but you keep being attracted to little kids, and many people start to realize this during adolescence. So imagine trying to deal with that during adolescence in addition to the other confusing feelings that you're having.

If America is totally off course on this issue, is there any country that is getting it right?
We're not that unique. But Germany is ahead of the curve. They have a large scale treatment program called Prevention Project Dunkenfeld, which is probably the first large scale treatment project that also includes non-offenders. They have billboards everywhere: "Do you have attraction to children in ways that you shouldn't? You are not responsible for your attraction, but you are responsible for your behavior."

OK, so as a guy with two young kids, how do I protect them?
There's no easy answer to that, but you want to protect them from sex offenders. Most people who offend are not actually pedophiles. It's interesting: When you talk about pedophiles, people think about the children. And they're right. But what about the children who are struggling with this disorder? We need to help them, too.

But you can understand if maybe I'll just try to keep them away from pedophiles anyway.
I can understand that. We need to prevent pedophiles from sexually offending and to do that, we need to refocus on early intervention, treatment and prevention. It's not always going to work. No treatment of any mental disorder will always work. Depression treatment, schizophrenia treatment — they don't always work. But we don't throw our hands into the air and wait until the consequences of those conditions become bad before we do something. With pedophiles, we've already thrown our hands into the air. We should not be taking this tactic. The dire consequences only make it more important that we reach out and treat early.

Follow @VictorFiorillo on Twitter.




DHS SECRETARY THREATENS US SHERIFFS: Obama Will Cut Their Grants If Congress Does Not Fund Amnesty

DHS SECRETARY THREATENS US SHERIFFS: Obama Will Cut Their Grants If Congress Does Not Fund Amnesty

Department of Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson threatened US sheriffs today. Johnson told the sheriffs that they will not receive federal grants they are counting on if the Republican Congress does not fund amnesty.

jeh johnson

Sheriff Justin Smith from Larimer County Colorado posted this tonight on his Facebook page:

I received a very interesting veiled threat letter from Jeh Johnson, the Secretary of Homeland Security addressed to all police chiefs and sheriffs around the country.

His letter made it clear that if Congress didn’t send President Obama the DHS funding bill that he wanted (rubberstamping the president’s executive amnesty), local and state public safety agencies would not receive federal grants they were counting on because the president would veto the DHS funding bill.

Let me get this straight – the president believes he has the authority to nullify federal laws that don’t serve his personal agenda, but if Congress dares to exercise it’s responsibility of controlling the purse strings, he will willingly hold public safety grants hostage just to get his way?

Mr. President, you don’t have to love the Congress we elected, but you do have to respect their role as established under the Constitution -and Mr. Johnson, please show some integrity and stop with the threats. Sheriffs don’t take kindly to them.

 Like us on Facebook.   Follow us on Twitter.




Tuesday, February 3, 2015

Christian bakers face government wrath for refusing to make cake for gay wedding


Christian bakers face government wrath for refusing to make cake for gay wedding
660-Sweet-Cakes-by-Melissa.jpg 

FILE - In this undated photograph Aaron Klein stands behind the counter of his Oregon bakery, Sweet Cakes by Melissa. Since this photo was taken the store has closed. The Kleins now operate their bakery business out of their home. (Sweet Cakes by Melissa)

Aaron and Melissa Klein refused to bake a wedding cake for a gay couple, and now they must pay for their crime.

An Oregon administrative law judge ruled on Jan. 29 that the owners of Sweet Cakes by Melissa did, in fact, discriminate in 2013 when they declined to provide a wedding cake for a lesbian couple because it would have violated their Christian beliefs against same-sex marriage.

The judge’s ruling paves the way for a March 10 hearing at which the Christian business owners could be ordered to pay $200,000 in fines and damages.

“You cannot discriminate on the basis of sexual orientation,” Paul Thompson, the attorney representing the lesbian couple, told The Oregonian. “The entire time, I felt the law was very much on our side because the law is black and white.”

You can read the judge’s 52-page order here. 

Last year, investigators concluded the bakers had violated the couple’s rights to equal treatment in places that serve the public. State law bans discrimination against LGBT people in places that serve the public — and that includes bakeries.

I spoke with Aaron Klein by telephone Monday night. He told me the judge’s ruling is a miscarriage of justice and an erosion of religious liberty.

“They’re trying to push us into the closet for being Christians,” he said.

Klein said it’s time for Americans to take a stand for religious liberty.

“The Founding Fathers said we have the inalienable rights given by God — not man,” he said. “Let’s exercise those rights.”

The Kleins’ troubles started in January 2013 when they turned away that lesbian couple. The bakers were relentlessly pummeled in the media. LGBT activists launched protests and boycotts. They tell me their small children even received death threats — simply because they chose to follow the teachings of their faith.

At some point the activists threatened to launch boycotts against any wedding vendor that did business with the Kleins. That turned out to be the death blow to their retail shop. Today, Melissa bakes cakes out of the family’s home.

The question now is how much — if anything — the Kleins will be forced to pay. Labor Commissioner Brad Avakian will decide, and history proves he’s no friend of the Christian bakers.

In 2013, Avakian told The Oregonian that it is the government’s desire was to rehabilitate businesses like the one owned by the Kleins. 

“Everybody is entitled to their own beliefs, but that doesn’t mean that folks have the right to discriminate,” he told the newspaper. “The goal is never to shut down a business. The goal is to rehabilitate.”

Rehabilitate? He wants to ship the Christians off to a government-sanctioned re-education camp?

Aaron Klein told me there will be no reconciliation and there will be no rehabilitation. He and his wife will not back down from their Christian beliefs.

“There’s nothing wrong with what we believe,” he said. “It’s a biblical point of view. It’s my faith. It’s my religion.”

Klein said the ruling, which he called “absolutely absurd,” does not surprise him.

“I’ve never seen a government entity use a law to come after somebody because they have a religious view,” he said. “I truly believe Brad Avakian is trying to send a message. I don’t think the constitution of the state of Oregon means anything to these people.”

And I’m afraid there are more narrow-minded government officials just like Avakian.

Kelvin Cochran was fired from his job as the fire chief of Atlanta after he wrote a book that affirmed biblical morality. The book included references to homosexuality that angered the city’s LGBT community. The city’s mayor denied Cochran was let go because of his religious beliefs, but I believe the evidence seems to prove otherwise.

A Colorado baker was ordered by a judge either to serve gay couples or face fines. Jack Phillips, the owner of Masterpiece Cakeshop, was told to “cease and desist from discriminating” against gay couples. Phillips is a Christian.

New Mexico’s Supreme Court ruled unanimously that two Christian photographers who declined to photograph a same-sex union violated the state’s Human Rights Act. One justice said photographers Elaine and Jonathan Huguenin were “compelled by law to compromise the very religious beliefs that inspire their lives.” 

And the Washington attorney general filed a lawsuit against a florist who refused to provide flowers for a same-sex couple’s wedding. She told the Christian Broadcasting Network she “had to take a stand” in defense of her faith in Christ. 

The evidence seems to indicate that Christian business owners are being intentionally singled out for persecution. And it appears the courts are consistently ruling that gay rights trump everyone else’s rights.

The Constitution guarantees every American a right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.

Melissa Klein makes wedding cakes. That’s her pursuit of happiness. Should she be denied that right simply because of her Christian faith?

Todd Starnes is host of Fox News & Commentary, heard on hundreds of radio stations. Sign up for his American Dispatch newsletter, be sure to join his Facebook page, and follow him on Twitter. His latest book is "God Less America."




Republican women in the Champaign area launched a new group

TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 03, 2015

Screen Shot 2015-02-02 at 11.29.37 AM

CHAMPAIGN, IL - With a new Republican governor and a GOP majority in the U.S. Congress, Republican women are energized to bring some of that Republican wave to the Illinois General Assembly. After twelve years with no organization, Republican women in the Champaign area launched a new group Saturday. 

"Republican Women Champaign County is pleased to participate as the newest organization and affiliate to the Illinois Federation of Republican Women and National Federation of Republican Women," said Stephanie Holderfield, the group's new president.  

The new group met the ten member requirement as well as three affiliate memberships, giving the RWCC charter status with the Illinois Federation of Republican Women.

"We, in Champaign County, have renewed our interest in having an organization geared towards reaching out to women that are like-minded, and committed to bringing about change to our community," Holderfield said. "The goal of the RWCC is to enlist women from all economic and social backgrounds, abilities and talents to achieve a cohesive relationship within the Champaign County GOP."

Attending the premiere event were State Senator Chapin Rose, House Representative Chad Hays, and IFRW Membership Chair Jayne Lehman Raef.

Several locally elected officials came, including Gordy Hulten County Clerk, J.J. Farney County Auditor, Linda Frank former Circuit Clerk, Karen Foster and Deb Frank Feinen both Champaign City Council and Mayoral Candidates, Brian Kelly Vice-Chair CCGOP and Gary Maxwell Champaign County Board. 

For more information about the group, write republicanwomenchampaigncounty@gmail.com . 




Driver’s Insurance to be Cancelled Over ‘Christ’ on Car

Driver’s Insurance to be Cancelled Over ‘Christ’ on Car

What does having a sticker that says “Christ” on a car have to do with insuring the vehicle? Apparently a lot, as one woman is facing losing her insurance because she has stickers on her car with the word “Christ” on them.

christ car

Rev. Wena Parry, from Cymmer in Neath Port Talbot, told BBC Wales’ “X-Ray” program she has been treated unfairly by Age UK Insurance because of her religious beliefs.

“Every opportunity I have I want to tell people about Jesus,” she said.

“I reckon there must at least a million people who have read the texts on my car and no one has had a problem with it before. There might be somebody within that company that hates Christianity.”

The 76-year-old pastor spent $180 on the red-and-black-lettered messages “spreading the gospel” on her silver Vauxhall Zafira.

But Age UK Insurance said it never would have insured the woman if it had known about the statement on the hood and the side of her vehicle.

Company officials first became aware of the messages when Parry submitted a claim on her insurance after thieves damaged her exhaust and stole a piece of the engine. They couldn’t help but notice the mentions of Christ in the photographs.

The insurers told Parry she had 10 days to explain why she hadn’t informed them about the stickers, warning “the policy may be declared void.”

Age UK Insurance sent her a letter, reading: “These modifications do not fit our acceptance criteria for motor insurance.

“Cover would have been declined if we had been made aware of these at the time of purchasing your policy.”

The insurance company denies that their threat has anything to do with religion, but it’s hard to understand how stickers of the word “Christ” have anything to do with insuring a car in case of an accident. For her part, Parry has already found another insurance company to give her business to, and Age UK might find themselves losing business from Christians as word of this gets out.




ILLINOIS: HB 217 TO BAN THERAPY FOR MINORS WITH UNWANTED SAME-SEX ATTRACTION [VIDEO]

Feb 2, 2015

http://illinoisreview.typepad.com/illinoisreview/2015/02/hb-217-to-ban-therapy-for-minors-with-unwanted-same-sex-attraction-video.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+typepad%2FbYHz+%28Illinois+Review%29

The politicians in Springfield are at it again. HB 217 would ban reparative therapy for minors with unwanted same-sex attractions. Peter LaBarbera of Americans for Truth about Homosexuality is warning about this invasion of privacy rights.

Monday, February 2, 2015

Homosexual Foster Dad Let Baby Die in Hot Car; His Sentence is Outrageous

Homosexual Foster Dad Let Baby Die in Hot Car; His Sentence is Outrageous

 By 

Seth Jackson (right) and Payton Schroeder

Seth Jackson (right) and Payton Schroeder

A homosexual foster dad left his 10-month-old daughter to die in a hot car while he and his partner smoked marijuana and watched “Game of Thrones.”

The Kansas man, Seth M. Jackson, pleaded guilty to involuntary manslaughter of his daughter, Kadillak Poe-Jones, who tragically took her last breath on July 24. 

Jackson’s lawyer, Leslie Hulnick, in arguing for probation, said that, “This is a mistake that could happen to anyone,” reports the Wichita Eagle, while Jackson pleaded, “I am not a menace to society.” 

Kadillak is “not going to learn how to ride a bicycle for the first time. She is not going to have a first day of school. She’s not going to graduate high school. She’s not going to have that first kiss and meet someone and fall in love and get married and have a family,” Assistant District Attorney Mark Chotimongkol said. 

Kadillak Poe Jones, dead from being left in a hot car for over two hours while her gay foster parents got high on pot and watched "Game of Thrones"

Kadillak Poe Jones, dead from being left in a hot car for over two hours while her gay foster parents got high on pot and watched “Game of Thrones”

Jackson and his partner, Payton Schroeder watched over two hours of “Game of Thrones,” on a hot, 90-degree summer day while smoking pot, and have three other foster children ages 3, 5 and 18, and two adopted children ages 5 and 7 who were taken by the state, reports the Daily Mail. 

“I’m not a monster,” said Jackson, 29, in court on Friday as he begged the judge to not give him jail time. He was only sentenced to 32 months in prison. In less than three years, he will be a free man after sentencing his own 10-month-old child to a death sentence.